Private Sector Housing Civil Financial Penalty Policy
Failure to comply with an Improvement Notice - Section 30 of the Housing Act 2004
Maximum Court fine following prosecution that can be levied for failure to comply with an Improvement Notice - Unlimited
An Improvement Notice served under Part 1 Housing Act 2004 specifies repairs, improvements that the recipient should carry out to address one or more identified Category 1 and or Category 2 hazards in a property. Category 1 hazards are the most serious hazards, judged to have the highest risk of harm to the occupiers; the Council has a duty to take appropriate action where a dwelling is found to have one or more Category 1 hazards present.
In some cases, the service of an Improvement Notice will have followed an informal stage, where the landlord had been given the opportunity to carry out improvements without the need for formal action. In such cases, an identified failure to comply with an Improvement Notice will represent a continued failure on the part of the landlord to deal appropriately with one or more significant hazards affecting the occupier[s] of the relevant dwelling.
The Council would view the offence of failing to comply with the requirements of an Improvement Notice as a significant issue, exposing the tenant[s] of a dwelling to one or more significant hazards.
The seriousness of the offence is viewed by the Council as being a Severe matter, attracting a financial penalty with a starting level of £22500.
Under the Council's policy the civil penalty for a landlord controlling, owning, managing one or two dwellings, including no more than one HMO, with no other relevant factors or aggravating features [see below], will reduce by £5000, attracting a civil penalty of £17500.
Under the Council's policy, the civil penalty for a landlord controlling, owning, managing a significant property portfolio, being three, four, or five dwellings, and/or two HMOs, with no other relevant factors or aggravating features [see below], will attract a civil penalty of £22500.
Under the Council's policy, the civil penalty for a landlord controlling, owning, managing a large property portfolio, being six or more dwellings, and or three or more HMOs and/or has demonstrated experience in the letting or management of property (irrespective of the size of the portfolio), with no other relevant factors or aggravating factors [see below], will increase by £5000, attracting a civil penalty of £27500.
Aggravating features/factors specific to non-compliance with an Improvement Notice
The nature and extent of hazards that are present. Multiple hazards and, or severe or extreme hazards that are considered to have a significant impact on the health and/or safety of the occupant[s] in the property or their guests would justify an increase in the level of the civil penalty
The Council will have regard to general factors in determining the final level of the civil penalty including, but not limited to:
- a previous history of non-compliance would justify an increased civil penalty. Non-exhaustive examples of previous non-compliance would include previous successful prosecutions [including recent convictions that were 'spent'], receipt of financial penalties, rent repayment orders, works in default of the landlord and breaches of regulations or obligations, irrespective of whether these breaches had been the subject of separate formal action.
- a failure to cooperate with a Council investigation. Non-exhaustive examples of failure to cooperate would include failing to comply with a s.16 Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976 notice, failing to comply with a s.235 Housing Act 2004 notice, failing to provide a substantive response to a letter of alleged offence.
- deliberate intent when committing the offence. Non-exhaustive examples of deliberate intent would include knowledge that the offence was occurring, committing the offence after relevant correspondence was sent by the Council.
- the number of residents placed at risk
- offending over an extended period i.e. 6 months or longer
- whether any vulnerable residents were in occupation at the time of the offence. Non-exhaustive examples of vulnerable residents include young adults and children, persons vulnerable by virtue of age, persons vulnerable by virtue of disability or sensory impairment, persons with a drug or alcohol addiction, victims of domestic abuse, children in care or otherwise vulnerable by virtue of age, people with complex health conditions, people who do not speak English as their first language, victims of trafficking or sexual exploitation, refugees, asylum seekers